Critical review of international social and political philosophy
Paginering:
Jaargang 10 (2007) nr. 3 pagina's 339-358
Jaar:
2007-09
Inhoud:
Democratic deliberation is credited with a variety of virtues, including its possible usefulness in resolving, or at least ameliorating, inter-cultural conflicts. This paper questions this claim. First, it overlooks that the facts and principles involved in these conflicts generally prove contestable and that such contestation is likely to be greater the less homogenous societies are. Second, it neglects that many, if not most, citizens have neither the time nor the inclination to acquire the conceptual and factual knowledge needed to try and overcome these differences. As a result, the more inclusive and popular deliberation becomes, the less suitable it may be for overcoming cross cultural disagreements. Indeed, it has the potential to exacerbate rather than narrow the differences between majorities and minorities. These conclusions are drawn from an empirical review of a Canadian debate about aboriginal rights that followed a controversial Supreme Court of Canada decision and comparing the character of deliberation in three contexts: the legal community, the print media and legislative bodies.
Tijdschrift beschrijving